Measurement of Gases in Carbonated Beverages

What the ISBT CO₂ Quality Guidelines Actually Require

Carbon dioxide is one of the few ingredients in a carbonated drink that the consumer never sees on the label, yet it touches every bottle. The International Society of Beverage Technologists (ISBT) sets the quality guidelines that define what "beverage-grade" CO₂ means, and those guidelines are the reference the whole supply chain works to. From the producer purifying the gas to the bottler accepting a tanker at the gate. This article sets out what the ISBT CO₂ quality guidelines actually require, and why each limit sits where it does.

Where the guidelines came from

The ISBT guidelines exist because contamination in CO₂ has caused real problems. The most cited example is a benzene-in-CO₂ incident in the United Kingdom that prompted the industry to tighten its expectations and standardize testing. The guidelines translate that hard-won experience into a defined specification: a list of impurities, a maximum limit for each, and an analytical method to measure it. They are voluntary in the sense that ISBT is not a regulator, yet in practice they function as the commercial baseline; a producer who cannot demonstrate compliance will struggle to sell into the beverage market.

The structure: three reasons a limit exists

Every limit in the guidelines carries a rationale, and understanding the rationale explains why some numbers are far stricter than others. ISBT groups the reasons into three categories. Sensory limits cover parameters with potential negative impacts on the taste, odor or appearance of the finished drink; these dominate the list, because the consumer notices an off-flavor long before any safety threshold is reached. Operational limits are process control parameters. Food safety limits cover parameters with the potential to be a food safety hazard; they concern safety rather than preference.

The headline limits

The guidelines specify CO₂ purity at a minimum of 99.9% by volume, with the balance made up of trace impurities held to tight ceilings. The table below sets out the full list. All specifications are volume / volume (v/v) unless otherwise annotated.

Parameter ISBT limit ‡ ISBT rationale
Purity (Assay) 99.90 % min. Operational
Moisture (H₂O) 20.0 ppm max. Operational
Oxygen (O₂) 30.0 ppm max. Sensory
Carbon Monoxide (CO) 10.0 ppm max. Operational and Food Safety
Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) 5.0 ppm max. Food Safety
Nitrogen Monoxide (NO) 2.50 ppm max. Food Safety
Nitrogen Dioxide (NO₂) 2.50 ppm max. Food Safety
Non-volatile Residue (NVR) 10.0 ppm w/w max. Sensory
Non-volatile Organic Residue (NVOR) 5.0 ppm w/w max. Sensory
Methanol (CH₃OH) 10.0 ppm max. Operational and Sensory
Total Hydrocarbons (THC) (as Methane) 50.0 ppm max., including 20.0 ppm total non-methane hydrocarbons Sensory
Ammonia (NH₃) 2.50 ppm max. Sensory
Acetaldehyde (C₂H₄O, or AA) 0.20 ppm max. Sensory
Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C₆H₆) 20.0 ppb (0.020 ppm) max. Food Safety
Total Sulfur (TS), excluding sulfur dioxide 0.10 ppm max. Sensory
Sulfur Dioxide (SO₂) 1.0 ppm max. Sensory
Odor of Solid CO₂ (Snow) No foreign odor Sensory
Appearance of Solid CO₂ (Snow) No foreign appearance Sensory
Odor & Taste in Water No foreign odor or taste Sensory
Appearance in Water No color or turbidity Sensory

ISBT limits reproduced from the 2021 edition, Revision 4.
‡ Original Source: ISBT Bulk Carbon Dioxide Quality Guidelines and Analytical Methods and Techniques Reference © 1999
Rationale, as ISBT defines it: Operational, a process control parameter. Food Safety, a parameter with the potential to be a food safety hazard. Sensory, a parameter with potential negative impacts on beverage taste, odor or appearance.
ISBT notes that beverage manufacturers should evaluate the sensitivity of their products to trace levels of these impurities, and that lower limits may be required for some products, to be agreed between supplier and customer.

The limit of detection AirBreather achieves against each line is set out in the AirBreather Systems CO₂ brochure (PDF).

The food safety lines deserve attention: carbon monoxide, the oxides of nitrogen, and aromatic hydrocarbons, measured as benzene, capped at 20 parts per billion. These are the limits set on safety grounds, and they are the ones an auditor will scrutinize most closely.

Why benzene is the limit that defines the rest

Of all the impurities on the list, benzene is the one that concentrates the mind. It is a known carcinogen, it is regulated rather than merely undesirable, and at 20 ppb its limit is among the tightest in the guidelines. That combination makes benzene a useful proxy for the seriousness of a monitoring program: a system that resolves benzene confidently, with margin below the limit, is generally a system you can trust across the rest of the specification. A system that can only just reach the limit leaves no room for the natural variation in any measurement, and no room for confidence.

This is the practical heart of the guidelines. Meeting a limit on paper is not the same as proving it on a live stream, batch after batch. The value of a monitoring program lies in the margin between what the instrument can detect and the limit it is measuring against, a point explored in our companion article on detection limits and compliance limits.

How the specification is verified

The guidelines pair each limit with a defined analytical method, because a number means little without a repeatable way to measure it. Aromatic hydrocarbons, for instance, are determined by gas chromatography. It is worth noting that the ISBT limit is expressed "as benzene" and treats the aromatics as a single group; a system that speciates them resolving benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (BTEX) individually rather than reporting one combined total. This tells you not just that aromatics are present but which ones, which often points to the source of a contamination. In practice, robust verification means measuring many impurities continuously rather than sampling occasionally, alarming on any excursion, and producing an auditable record for batch release, with spot checks from a portable gas purity monitoring system where an incoming tanker needs verifying at the gate. The strongest programs cross-check critical results with more than one analytical technique, so that a pass is corroborated rather than asserted particularly for the safety-driven limits where the cost of being wrong is highest.

What good looks like

A producer or bottler working to the ISBT guidelines should be able to answer three questions without hesitation: which impurities are being measured, what margin sits between the result and each limit, and how that result would stand up to an audit. A monitoring system that exceeds the ISBT guidelines measuring well beyond the minimum list, resolving the safety-critical aromatics far below 20 ppb, and issuing a secure certificate of analysis turns those three questions from a worry into a routine.

Learn more: see how AirBreather verifies benzene in beverage-grade CO₂ to 1 ppb, 20× below the ISBT limit → beverage CO₂ benzene monitoring

FAQ

  • Are the ISBT CO₂ guidelines mandatory? ISBT is not a regulator, but the guidelines are the commercial baseline for beverage-grade CO₂; compliance is effectively required to sell into the market.
  • What is the ISBT limit for benzene? Aromatic hydrocarbons, expressed as benzene, are limited to 0.020 ppm v/v (20 ppb), on food safety grounds.
  • How is beverage-grade CO₂ tested? Each impurity has a defined method; the most reliable programs measure continuously and corroborate safety-critical results with more than one technique.

Related solutions from ASTG